Dr Prerna Kohli

Making Friends Abroad After 30: Why It’s Harder for NRIs, and What Actually Works

NRI Mental Health · Loneliness & Belonging

Making Friends Abroad After 30: Why It's Harder for NRIs, and What Actually Works

You had a full social life in India, or built one easily in your twenties. Now you're in a new country, past the age where friendship happens by accident, and it isn't obvious how it's supposed to happen at all.

Quick answer: Making friends abroad after 30 is genuinely harder, for structural reasons that have nothing to do with your personality: no built-in proximity, no repeated unplanned contact, and migration disrupting the network you already had. Trying harder to be likeable rarely moves it. What the research points to instead is deliberately rebuilding repeated contact, in the same place, over months.

Nothing is wrong with you if this feels harder than it used to. The conditions that built your old friendships, whether you noticed them or not, simply aren't there by default anymore. They have to be built on purpose now.
PK

From a clinical-psychology lens. Dr. Prerna Kohli is a psychologist with a PhD & M.Phil, Clinical Psychology, Aligarh Muslim University, and more than 30 years of practice with Indian individuals and families, in India and across the diaspora. She was honoured among the "100 Women Achievers of India" (an award presented by the President of India), is a TEDx speaker and published author, and is profiled on Wikipedia and Wikidata. Her work on NRI loneliness regularly involves clients who are professionally successful and socially well-liked, yet quietly friendless in the place they now live.

Why adult friendship is structurally harder, even before immigration enters the picture

In school and college, friendship happened without much effort because the conditions for it were built into your day: you saw the same people constantly, without planning to, in settings where it was safe to be a little unfiltered. Sociologist Rebecca Adams has described three conditions researchers have long considered crucial for friendship to form: proximity, repeated unplanned interaction, and a setting relaxed enough that people let their guard down. A hostel corridor or a college canteen supplies all three automatically. An adult life mostly doesn't. Work colleagues offer proximity but rarely the unplanned, low-stakes repetition, or the guard-down quality, that turns a colleague into a friend. This is a big part of why friendship gets harder for almost everyone after their twenties, well before you add a border crossing to the equation.

Urban sociologist Ray Oldenburg's concept of "third places", informal spots people return to regularly outside home and work, a regular café, a gym class, a place of worship, a hobby group, describes the kind of setting that used to supply proximity and repetition by accident. Most adult lives abroad simply don't include one unless it's deliberately built.

The extra layer immigration adds on top of that

Psychologists Toni Antonucci and Robert Kahn's social convoy model describes how each of us moves through life surrounded by a "convoy" of relationships that provides support along the way, and how major life transitions can disrupt that convoy significantly. Migration is one of the more disruptive transitions this model was built to explain: it doesn't just remove your existing convoy from daily reach, it also drops you into a place where you have to rebuild one from close to zero, often while also managing a new job, a new home, and frequently a partner and children going through the identical disruption at the same time. Research using Canada's General Social Survey found recent immigrants reporting meaningfully higher loneliness than Canadian-born residents, and, notably, that this didn't reliably improve with more years in the country. Feeling similarly stuck several years in isn't a sign you're doing something wrong; it's a documented pattern, not a personal failure.

Direct research on India-origin, working-age immigrants specifically is limited; most of what exists on South Asian immigrants and loneliness focuses on older adults. What's described here draws on the broader immigrant-loneliness and adult-friendship literature, not India-specific statistics, because those largely don't exist yet at this level of detail.

How long it actually takes, and why the timeline itself is the useful part

Communication researcher Jeffrey Hall studied adult friendship formation across two groups, adults who had recently relocated, recalling their own new relationships, and a separate group of college students tracked as their friendships formed. The two groups produced somewhat different numbers, but taken together, the commonly cited, rounded estimate is roughly 50 hours of time together to become a casual friend, roughly 90 hours to become a friend, and 200 or more hours to become a genuinely close friend, hours spent actually hanging out, not simply working alongside someone. Treat this as a reasonable real-world ballpark rather than an exact rule; the point isn't the precise number. It's the reminder that closeness abroad is accumulated through repeated contact over months, not produced by a single good conversation, promising as that conversation felt.

Composite case, not a real client

The friendly acquaintance treadmill

Meera had lived in the same US city for four years, had pleasant colleagues, a friendly building, and a WhatsApp group of other Indian families from her son's school. On paper, she wasn't isolated. But nobody in her life felt like someone she could call on a genuinely bad day, and she'd started to wonder if something about her had changed since her twenties, when friendship had felt effortless.

What had actually happened was closer to structural than personal: every relationship in her life was pleasant but single-context, the school group only at pickup, colleagues only at work, and none of them had accumulated the repeated, unplanned, slightly-off-script contact that turns pleasant into close. She picked one recurring activity, a weekly badminton group, treated attendance as non-negotiable for three months regardless of how tired she was, and let two of those relationships extend outside the court on their own, rather than trying to deepen every pleasant acquaintance at once.

This case is a composite drawn from patterns common across many NRI clients I have worked with. It does not describe a real client, and no identifying detail belongs to any one family.

Where new friendships actually start abroad

The common thread across what tends to work is the same one the research points to: recurring, low-stakes, unplanned-feeling contact in one place over time, rather than a single big effort. A weekly class, a regular volunteering shift, a place of worship attended consistently rather than occasionally, a recurring parents' group, a sport played on the same evening every week. What tends not to work as well is a one-off large event, a big Diwali party or a networking mixer, treated as the whole strategy; these are useful for meeting people, but the friendship itself is built afterward, in whichever smaller, repeated context follows.

It's also worth being honest about which relationships are likely to stay single-context. Work friendships and school-gate friendships are real and valuable, but they often don't survive a job change or the children growing older, because the proximity that sustained them was circumstantial rather than chosen. That's not a reason to devalue them while they last; it's a reason not to rely on them as your only source of connection.

A practical way to build this on purpose

  1. Pick one recurring thing, not five one-off things. A single weekly commitment you keep showing up to will get you further than a scattering of events attended once each.
  2. Treat the first two months as unglamorous and expect that. Given Hall's research, early attendance is investment toward a threshold, not a referendum on whether "it's working."
  3. Say yes to the second invitation, not just the first. A coffee after class is easy to accept once and easy to let lapse; the second and third times are where a pattern, and the relationship, actually forms.
  4. Let one relationship extend past its original context. When someone from a group texts you outside the group's usual time or place, that's the actual signal a friendship is forming, worth responding to promptly rather than filing away.
  5. Notice if you're only doing this with other Indians, or only with people from your workplace. Either is fine as a starting point, but a social world with only one entry point is more fragile if that one context changes.
  6. If a spouse or family is also involved, don't assume the household is building one shared network by default. It's common for one partner's social effort to quietly cover for both; check whether the other partner has any recurring contact of their own.

If the loneliness has been persistent for a long stretch and comes with low mood, loss of interest in things you used to enjoy, or a sense of hopelessness about it ever changing, that's worth a proper evaluation rather than assuming more effort at socialising will resolve it on its own.

When to bring this to counselling

Bring it in if loneliness has settled in for a long time despite genuine effort, if it's affecting your mood, sleep or motivation, or if you keep finding reasons not to follow through on the recurring contact that research says actually works. Sessions are online, scheduled across time zones, for individuals and couples across the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and the Gulf, and working with someone who understands the specific texture of NRI isolation can help you figure out what's actually in the way, whether that's the practical logistics of meeting people or something harder to name underneath it.

Evidence and context

12%
Share of US adults reporting no close friends in 2021, up from just 3% in 1990, according to the Survey Center on American Life's national survey on friendship.
~200 hrs
Roughly the amount of time spent together that Jeffrey Hall's research on adult friendship associates with the shift from "friend" to "close friend," across his studies of relocated adults and college students.
1980
The year Kahn and Antonucci described the "social convoy" model, explaining how major transitions like migration disrupt the support networks people carry through life.

Sources: Cox, "The State of American Friendship: Change, Challenges, and Loss," Survey Center on American Life (AEI), 2021; Hall, "How Many Hours Does It Take to Make a Friend?," Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2019 (figures are approximate, based on retrospective self-report among recently relocated adults); Kahn & Antonucci, "Convoys over the Life Course," in Life-Span Development and Behavior, Vol. 3, 1980; Statistics Canada, General Social Survey, 2018, on elevated loneliness among recent immigrants. Direct research on India-origin working-age immigrants specifically is limited; figures above are drawn from the broader adult-friendship and immigrant-loneliness literature, not India-specific data.

Frequently asked questions

Why did making friends feel so much easier in my twenties?

It usually wasn't about being more sociable then. College and early jobs typically supply built-in proximity and constant unplanned contact automatically. Adult life abroad rarely does, so the same social skills produce fewer friendships unless you deliberately recreate those conditions.

Is it normal to still feel friendless after several years abroad?

Yes, and research on immigrant loneliness has found it doesn't reliably fade just with time in a country. What tends to move it is deliberately building recurring, repeated contact in one place, not the passage of years by itself. Feeling stuck several years in is a documented pattern, not a sign you're uniquely bad at this.

Should I only try to make friends with other Indians?

Either can work, and many people build a mix of both. The more useful question is whether your social world has more than one entry point, since relying on a single context, only other Indians, or only your workplace, makes the whole thing more fragile if that one context changes.

How many hours does it actually take to become close with someone?

Research by Jeffrey Hall, across studies of relocated adults and college students, put the commonly cited estimate at roughly 200 or more hours of time together for a relationship to become a close friendship. Treat it as a rough, encouraging benchmark rather than an exact number to track.

I keep meeting people at big events but nothing turns into a real friendship. Why?

Big one-off events are good for meeting people but rarely supply the repeated, low-stakes contact that actually builds closeness. The friendship tends to form afterward, in whatever smaller, recurring context follows, a coffee that becomes a regular thing, not the original event itself.

My spouse has an easier time making friends than I do. What's going on?

This is common and often circumstantial rather than a difference in social skill, one partner's job, children's school, or personality may simply supply more natural repeated contact. It's worth checking that both partners have some recurring social contact of their own, rather than one person's effort quietly covering for the household.

Do work friendships count as real friendships?

They can be genuinely valuable while they last, but many don't survive a job change, because the proximity holding them together was circumstantial. That's a reason to also build at least one friendship outside work, not a reason to dismiss the ones you have.

Is it too late to build a real social circle if I'm in my 40s or 50s?

No. The same conditions, proximity and repeated contact over months, work at any age; what changes with age is usually available time and energy, not capacity for friendship itself. Picking one recurring commitment and protecting it matters far more than the number on your birthday.

How do I stop feeling awkward reaching out to someone I've only met once or twice?

A specific, low-stakes invitation tied to something recurring, "a few of us grab coffee after the class most weeks, join if you're around", is easier to extend and easier to accept than a vague "let's hang out sometime." The specificity does most of the work, not your charm.

What if I try all this and it still doesn't work?

Give any one recurring context a genuine few months before concluding it isn't working, since the research suggests real closeness takes sustained time, not a few attempts. If persistent loneliness is affecting your mood or daily functioning despite real effort, that's worth bringing to a professional rather than assuming it will resolve with more socialising alone.

Does this connect to depression, or is it just a social problem?

It can be either, or both. Loneliness on its own is a social and emotional experience, not a diagnosis, but persistent isolation is a known risk factor for low mood, and the two can reinforce each other. If low mood, hopelessness, or loss of interest are present alongside the loneliness, that combination is worth a proper evaluation.

How is this different from the general NRI loneliness you write about elsewhere?

This piece focuses specifically on the practical mechanics of building new friendships as an adult abroad. The broader NRI loneliness picture covers the wider paradox of feeling isolated despite a materially successful life, of which friendlessness is one, very solvable, part.

You don't need a bigger personality. You need the right structure.

If loneliness abroad has settled in despite genuine effort, it helps to work through what's actually in the way with someone who understands the specific shape of NRI isolation.

Book a session WhatsApp +91 9811862338
PK

Dr. Prerna Kohli

Psychologist · PhD & M.Phil, Clinical Psychology, Aligarh Muslim University

More than 30 years of practice with Indian individuals, couples and families, in India and worldwide. Honoured among the "100 Women Achievers of India" by the President of India, TEDx speaker, published author. Profiled on the About page, Wikipedia and Wikidata.

This article is educational and does not replace personalised clinical advice.