Factitious Disorder Imposed on Another (FDIA)— historically known as Munchausen syndrome by proxy— is a serious mental health condition in which a caregiver fabricates, exaggerates, or deliberately induces illness in someone in their care, most often a child. It is both a recognised psychiatric disorder and a form of abuse: whatever the caregiver's psychology, the child is genuinely harmed. It is difficult to detect because authorities tend to believe the caregiver over the child, so cases are widely under-reported. If you suspect a child is being harmed in this way, it is a child-protection matter that needs to be acted on, not just observed.
A child instinctively feels safest with their parent. So what happens when the person meant to protect a child is the one harming them? Factitious Disorder Imposed on Another— still widely known by its older name, Munchausen syndrome by proxy— is one of the most difficult and least understood forms of abuse, precisely because it hides behind the appearance of a devoted, anxious caregiver. Understanding what it is, and how it affects the child, is the first step toward recognising and stopping it.
In simple terms: FDIA is a factitious disorder— a condition in which a person deliberately fakes, exaggerates, or causes illness. In FDIA, they do this not to themselves but to another person under their care. When that person is a child, it is a form of child abuse, regardless of the caregiver's underlying motivations.
What is Factitious Disorder Imposed on Another?
In psychology, factitious disorders are conditions in which a person intentionally produces or feigns illness without an obvious external reward such as money. There are two broad forms: one imposed on oneself (historically "Munchausen syndrome"), and one imposed on another person (historically "Munchausen syndrome by proxy," now FDIA). In the latter, the caregiver falsifies or induces symptoms in someone dependent on them. The people harmed are usually those least able to speak for themselves— most often young children, but also elderly or disabled dependents. It is reported more often in mothers than fathers, though it can involve any caregiver. The behaviour is frequently accompanied by significant emotional difficulty and distress in the caregiver, but that does not lessen the harm to the child.
Recognised warning signs
Clinicians and child-protection professionals look at patterns rather than single incidents. Some of the signs documented in the research literature include:
- A child with a long history of frequent hospital visits and admissions.
- Symptoms that are unusual, inconsistent, or that do not match test results.
- Symptoms reported only by one caregiver, with no independent witness.
- A child who appears to improve away from the caregiver and worsens in their presence.
- In the most serious cases, signs of deliberately induced harm.
- A similar pattern with siblings, or an unexplained death of a sibling in similar circumstances.
It is important to be clear: none of these, alone, confirms FDIA. They are concerns that warrant careful, professional assessment— by medical and child-protection authorities— not conclusions a family member or onlooker should reach or act on independently.
The effect on the child
FDIA is genuinely difficult to diagnose, in large part because people instinctively believe a concerned-seeming parent over a child— which is exactly why these cases remain so under-reported. It can be tempting to dismiss the behaviour as mere attention-seeking, but a sustained pattern of harmful behaviour toward a dependent child is not something to minimise. The child bears the greatest cost: repeated unnecessary medical procedures, the betrayal of their most fundamental relationship of trust, and emotional and developmental consequences that can last a lifetime. Childhood abuse affects not only a child emotionally but the developing brain itself. The child, not the caregiver, is the priority.
Suspected abuse of a child is a safeguarding emergency before it is anything else. If you believe a child is in immediate danger, contact your local emergency services right away. To report concerns about a child's safety, contact a child-protection or child-welfare helpline in your area. Do not attempt to confront a suspected caregiver or investigate on your own— that can place the child at greater risk. Raising your concern with the right authorities is what protects the child.
The Indian context
In India, deep cultural trust in the figure of the devoted mother can make this form of abuse especially hard to see or believe— the very idea can feel unthinkable, which is part of what allows it to continue undetected. Awareness among medical staff, teachers, and extended family matters enormously, because they are often the only people positioned to notice a pattern. Recognising that abuse can come from within the family, however uncomfortable, is essential to protecting vulnerable children.
Key takeaways
- FDIA (formerly Munchausen syndrome by proxy) is when a caregiver fabricates or induces illness in someone in their care— usually a child.
- It is both a recognised psychiatric disorder and a form of child abuse; the child is genuinely harmed.
- Warning signs are patterns, not single events, and require professional assessment— not amateur conclusions.
- It is under-reported because people tend to believe the caregiver over the child.
- Suspected abuse is a safeguarding matter first: contact a child-protection helpline or your local emergency services, and do not confront the caregiver yourself.
Frequently asked questions
Is Munchausen syndrome by proxy the same as FDIA?
Yes. "Munchausen syndrome by proxy" (MSbP) is the older, widely recognised name; the current clinical term is Factitious Disorder Imposed on Another (FDIA). They refer to the same condition— a caregiver fabricating, exaggerating, or inducing illness in a dependent, most often a child.
Is FDIA a mental illness or child abuse?
It is both. FDIA is a recognised psychiatric disorder affecting the caregiver, and the resulting behaviour is a form of child abuse that genuinely harms the child. The caregiver may need psychiatric treatment, but the child's safety is the immediate priority and is handled through child-protection channels.
What should I do if I suspect a child is being harmed this way?
Treat it as a safeguarding matter, not something to investigate yourself. If a child is in immediate danger, contact your local emergency services. To report concerns about a child, contact a child-protection or child-welfare helpline in your area. Do not confront the suspected caregiver directly— this can endanger the child further. Let trained professionals assess the situation.
Why is FDIA so hard to detect?
Because the caregiver typically presents as devoted and anxious, and adults instinctively believe a concerned parent over a child. Symptoms may also be genuinely produced, making them hard to distinguish from real illness. This combination means cases are frequently missed or doubted, and remain significantly under-reported.
For support in understanding or recovering from the effects of childhood abuse and trauma, Dr. Prerna Kohli offers warm, confidential care— in person in Gurugram and online across India and for NRIs worldwide. (If a child is in immediate danger, please contact a child-protection helpline or your local emergency services first.)
Book a Session WhatsApp Us